During the second five have lost their meaning birth rate and

 He Yafu
2   5 emphasis on Who leadership). Secondly, the never waver in the current fertility policy? view? is not disappointed? be honest, I do not feel disappointed, because I always think, in the September 25, 2010 before the birth rate and makes sense, this is a bottom line. After this date, whether it is When opening a second child, I think that has lost its meaning. belated justice and non-justice, not to mention, the second child is not completely let go of justice, justice, self-fertility is complete.
In my opinion, twenty-five users do not know: In China,
second child on the program I think, I am tire program of the serious shortcomings; the other hand, should not be a complete denial of a second child programs. So I do not agree with some people to put forward a second child program called Before the program is still progressive second child.
I am September began the full implementation of the one-child l r, was scheduled to implement this policy 30 years. that, after September 2010, the second child program is outdated, we should strive for self-fertility directly and not just for opening a second child. Some people may ask: let the second child for evil, not to fight, fight for independence fertility do it? In my opinion, reproductive rights and the right to life, is the most fundamental rights. reproductive rights are inherent, is to first place in the national and legal rights as basic human rights, reproductive rights and the other by the Constitution, the law gives the right to vote, political rights such as the right of association is different and not at any time deprivation.