23. Marx, when discussing the many issues that only the class, social, class struggle, but many of the obvious reasons he did not take into account that led to his theory is too extreme and narrow one-sided, and the error number of .24. Marx determinism of historical materialism is full of other ideas and his self-contradictory. dialectics is a magic weapon of Marxism, but in these issues, not dialectical Marxism .25. Marx that the State is a product of class struggle, and the country will disappear with the disappearance of the class. It is obvious, I should have errors. the simplification of complex issues, and ignore many important factors leading to a fundamental error. no communist government also apparently is the sky .26 . social conflicts can not be eliminated, because there are unrealistic communism is the eternal existence of the unfair, it is impossible to avoid conflicts, people tend to hurt all meet the interests of others, even if the infinite wealth of material goods, there will be the other can not be good to meet, such as the arrangement of time and space, which itself is exclusive, not simultaneously satisfy all the people very well. In addition there are many other factors that led to the desire for power, force, fight, will eventually form a strong state machine. The power of inequality will lead to exploitation of the presence of .27. Philosophy need a high IQ and comprehensive experience and understanding of this point, Marx does not have, not only reflects his doctrine His IQ is not high, but his lack of experience on many philosophical issues (such as religious practice and experience) and understanding (such as the understanding of religion and idealism). Some religions are based on evidence, such as Buddhism, which many scientists recognized. Marx that religion is an illusion, but a Marxist morality is actually nothing of .27. Marxist historical materialism, is not only one-sided, and not completely materialistic, just to see people such as Marx's social attributes, not from the materialistic, biological or genetic point of view of others, etc., which itself is a bit of idealism, because Marxism is often related to mental or spiritual comes down to idealism. In addition it is also thinking and good and evil analysis from the perspective of idealism .29. Marx's labor theory of value is purely a very rough, and the error, Marx's theory of surplus value and thus also the error, and extreme, parochial. Market competition is not sufficient or the presence of monopoly, the labor theory of value is not applicable, but monopoly in fact everywhere, absolutely free competition exists in the ideal state, especially now that the era of knowledge economy, technology monopoly is also protected by law, the labor theory of value for very little .30. Marx's moral exposition is empty talk. in the presence of retribution for the good, selfless is a rational idea, so more can be popular. but in the absence of retribution, afterlife, hell, any moral teachings are produced out of thin air irrational. If the case is not retribution, evil atheist propaganda still possible, even likely that not a selfish person is a fool. China today, there is this kind of thinking .31. Marx's philosophy is based on a number of phenomena one kind of speculation, such speculation has a lot of ancient philosophy and a consistent place, such as conflict of yin and yang and tai chi diagram, and the phenomenon of Marx lack of more experience, such as no experience of meditation and enlightenment, which may cause his theory has flaws, but the experience of meditation and enlightenment is not the language to express, like materialism and idealism is definitely not scientific arguments can be resolved, because of idealism still is not contrary to science, Marx did not in-depth study of these content , for example I saw of Consciousness, is also not contrary to science, on the contrary recognized science. You can also give examples of the dream, the dream is an illusion though, but its contents still meet regularly. Marx's materialism and idealism in opposition not on differentiation, not Buddhist Dialectics in-depth .32. Marxist say that religion is an illusion, Engels, the reflected in the fantasy, in this reflection, the world super power has taken the form of human power. so empty illusion, not reality .33. flaunted materialism of Marxism to feature, but the Marxist view of human society and so has the idealistic tendency to .34. Marx said that religion is the opiate of the people of anesthesia. First of all this is not quite correct , as already discussed, but only with the anesthetic effects of religion, opium is sometimes played as an anesthetic drugs, and this is not the greatest harm of opium, or even benefits. On the contrary if any of the orthodox religion is right, Marxism is the drug is toxic people, meaning the drug is addictive, dependence, also led to Yuhenantian, causing pain and desire can not meet the competition struggles to meet the desires and the pain of hell. Materialism will inevitably lead to people's lust, greed for material desires , sexual indulgence, such as communism itself shows the desire for material expectations, desires, the nature of a drug is that it is addictive, and very painful if not meet, but also the desire to fight, of course, Shared retribution, or negligible, a deeper hell retribution is still .35. Marx said: Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, is the ruthless world of sentient beings. but not the low status of religious believers who, like President Bush, the richest man Bill Gates Mainz, scientists Newton, etc., the United States most people are religious, while the U.S. is actually the most affluent and developed countries. Marx's proletariat and the working class still is in a capitalist society, the oppressed, the time when the oppressed They have some good qualities, such as unity, hard working and so on, but once they rise in status will be changed appearance, loss of these qualities that promote their root causes, and easy to fall in the .36. is the essence of Marxist materialism dialectics, but many of his theory is metaphysical, the lack of differentiation, such as dialectical materialism, is the lack of performance. materialist dialectics is itself an incomplete syndrome, even before it can be said is a contradiction in terms. If we must believe that dialectic is the essence of Marxism, then Marx's theory is the dross of many. Marxist theoretical system itself is contradictory of the .37. Marx and the pursuit of equality, but he saw people equal, but to promote human and animal inequality, the status of the animals completely obliterate .38, the proletariat and the working class, Marx imagined ideas are noble, but it is not possible. Marxism has a high morality, and despise the other social forms of morality, but morality of Marxism empty nothingness, eventually lead to social morality or the lack of a rational scientific basis and destroyed.
many aspects of Marxist theory problems in the final analysis, their way of thinking or problem, for example, when a certain outcome trends or signs is equivalent to a certain result, such as the average profit margin, and Value. In addition to many one-sided exaggeration of the impact of factors, into a dead end to think that the only factor, factors such as an issue of class, They come to class on superficial factors to their roots. As another example, the social and economic impact of the superstructure, then Marx come to the economic base determines the superstructure. other on many issues, Marx does not in-depth practice of arbitrary conclusions, such as religious and mystical phenomena. Marxist critique of the metaphysical, but his argument that he is using metaphysical methods. Marx's critique of religion is a preconceived assumption that atheism is correct, religion is ridiculous, and then create their own critical theory of religion. The section assume that materialism is still very much set up, and then from the perspective of materialism, Marx pointed out the limitations, in fact, if it is from a religious or idealistic perspective, Marx's problem is more and more untenable. Marx bourgeois conscience and his revelations made him win wide support and faith, which to some extent conceal his limitations, in post-socialist countries, Marxism is to be deified, that the limitations of Marx is difficult The. Engels seems to have seen the limitations of Marxism, a shocking conversation: Reporter: development of, we do not intend to impose what the final rule to human beings. On the future of social organization with details of the target view? You in here with their shadows to be found. When we refer to the entire community of production hands, we will be satisfied, but we also clearly know that in the current federal government under the rule of monarchy, which is impossible. We are constantly developing commentators , but trying to external science, which makes people into a kind of speaking in front of the limitations of which to oppose the idealist.
Marxist empty nothingness, there is no rational basis for morality is liable to lead to moral decay and honor view upside down, when it comes to moral hazard occurs when the upper class, Marx can easily lead to the collapse of public ownership can not be achieved or. no rational and moral constraints, natural Renxinbugu, all are easily destroyed the moral, such as Li Yinhe, not out but the promotion of academic ethics promiscuous ruin. Only the Chinese make such a statement, in a more liberated no one that the Western countries.
Marxism there are a lot of limitations, may have a close relationship with the times, the times of Marx , is the nineteenth century. Theoretical Physics at the time appears to have developed to the point quite well, when the physical phenomena in general can be obtained from the corresponding theoretical description: the speed of mechanical movement of objects much smaller than the speed of light when accurately follow the laws of Newtonian mechanics; the law of electromagnetic phenomena are summarized in Maxwell's equations; thermal phenomena have a complete theory of thermodynamics and Boltzmann establish statistical physics and others. In this case, there were many people believe that physical The task is to learn the basic law is applied to specific issues, some specific calculations. Physics Kelvin Juetu authority announced, physics buildings were built in the future as long as accurate data accuracy, there is get rid of two cloud .20 century physics, the two clouds to disperse, and physics, the sky is not blue skies. Obviously Marx as the nineteenth century, people may carry the limitations of that era, that science is universal, the scientific theory as a mechanical , deterministic, one or the other. In Marxist theory, it is very obvious with this mark. such as the economic base determines the superstructure, as opposed to science and religion, and economics, as the value of the single factor the source of generation, value theory, another example that science is omnipotent, able to meet all human needs and recommend communism. twentieth-century physics allows us to recognize as the wave-particle two, complementarity principle, uncertainty time and space is relative. Marx is clearly wrong and that is very similar to classical physics, no wonder that Einstein did not believe that religion and science contradict or deny the existence of God, nor deny the supernatural phenomenon. And we are now a lot of anti- pseudo-people, including some scientists, are still in the era of classical physics, the backward way of thinking. Although the development of Marxist dialectics, critical metaphysics, but he himself can not help but fall into the trap of their own critique.
more about the limitations of Marx , mostly in places I did not stand on religious and idealistic perspective, but from the materialist point of view, if you stand on the standpoint of religion is more absurd, of course, Marx believed that religion and science negate these issues Idealism I had to find out from the problem of Marx's analysis to prove his argument wrong, and the argument from the idealistic point of view of science can exist. For the limitations of Marx pointed out, some netizens have back, see the back of the And I am Marxist planned economy, public ownership theory and his desire to eliminate the exploitation of the good is very respected, and even the defense, but I did point out his limitations, because many of Marx's ideas and theories not only does not cause long-lasting good social system, such as socialism (such as moral hazard will lead to the collapse of socialism) and communism, because it is utopian, but also lead to many problems, such as moral decline. without faith community more prone to brutal authoritarian, private ownership , war, exploitation and oppression. from a religious point of view, materialism is a trap, people addicted and can not understand the original self, and thus suffer sin.
as some friends say, Marxism was deified, This is not conducive to error correction and development of Marxism, which is a short-term behavior, eventually leading to the desert off of Marxism and marginalization, Liu Guoguang pointed out this problem to some extent because of the limitations of Marxism itself. see br>
No comments:
Post a Comment